J., 1999, Erratum: The effects of social structure, geographical structure and population size on the evolution of mitochondrial DNA.
Molecular clocks and the lineage sorting period., Journal of Molecular Evolution, 47, 21–31. J., 1998, The effects of social structure, geographical structure and population size on the evolution of mitochondrial DNA. 10, Princeton University Press (Princeton). Speciation, and Clines, Monographs in Population Biology, no. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Īvise, J.C., Arnold, J., Ball, R.M., Bermingham, E., Lamb, T., Neigel, J.E., Reeb, C.A., & Saunders, S.C., 1987, Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial bridge between population genetics and systematics, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18, 489–522.Īvise, J.C., 1999, Phylogeography: The History & Formation of Species, Harvard University Press (Cambridge).īak, P., 1996, How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality, Springer Verlag (New York).Įndler, J. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. Reliance on the argument of has led many to infer the earlier existence of a now defunct, complete barrier to gene flow between the gene pools. Since publication of, spatial boundaries between gene pools currently exchanging migrants on a regular basis have been identified in many widespread species. They could see no reason to expect such boundaries to emerge intrinsically and the few empirical examples available at that time seemed to be easily explained as cases of secondary contact after a period of complete geographical isolation. However, the argument provided by was, at best, a tenuous one that permitted research in this area to proceed without the burden of a seriously complicating factor.
A justification for this practice was provided in a seminal paper, which coined the term “phylogeography” and laid the groundwork for a great deal of recent research (mostly empirical) on the spatial distribution of genetic variation within species. Therefore, empirical observations of such boundaries are usually taken as evidence of a previous period of geographical isolation, unless there is an obvious change in environment that coincides with the boundary. Conventional wisdom in the field of population genetics suggests that discrete boundaries between distinctive, geographically adjacent biological populations must reflect the influence of external factors, such as differential selection or a barrier to dispersal.
0 kommentar(er)
